3950x vs 9900k reddit gaming. 0 GHZ 8 core boost, 3.

3950x vs 9900k reddit gaming The Ryzen 9 3950X is completely overkill if you only plan on gaming and streaming. There's just a massive one in rendering and other productivity workloads. It is fine enough, given you are not looking for either very specified or high demand use case. com Dec 9, 2019 · Today we're comparing the Ryzen 9 3950X and Core i9-9900KS in a massive number of games, using one of G. 300mhz on a single core boost that the cpu almost never has isnt going to lift the performance to 9900k level. In that case either cpu will do fine. Posted by u/bizude - No votes and 22 comments When a 5% advantage at 1080p gaming for the 9900K creates a narrative that it is by far the better gaming CPU, even tiny changes in performance like from cooling can completely change that narrative. The crazy low base clock will be an interesting thing to study. 3. At the single 9900k. Or check it out in the app stores   For pure gaming i9 9900k,else overall 3950x The 3950X does not perform significantly better than any other third-gen Ryzen chip in games. 9-5Ghz boost with a 5600X Business, Economics, and Finance. The question is whether your focus is more on gaming or on productivity (video editing, programming, blender, other computational stuff). In fact, it is actually regularly outperformed by various chips with significantly lower core counts in gaming benchmarks. 5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 3950X with 16-cores. We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3. 3700X is slightly cheaper, but slightly slower. The current $250 difference isn't an issue, and I can get a $30 bundle discount* on either from Micro Center (*$470 or $720). Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon… Don't worry about it. The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is newer than Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3. Reply reply If you're building just a gaming PC, please be aware that the 9700K has the same gaming performance as the 9900K and even 10700K. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. Skylake-X has basically been made irrelevant by the AMD Zen 2 chips, the 3900X is basically the same performance as the 7940X but costs about $900 less and uses 50 Hey, so this might be obvious to some, but I feel like this has to be said with a barrage of reviews that popped up today. 264 hardware The original benchmark graph for the first benchmark comparison between Comet Lake and Zen 2 (shown by Videocardz) is using wrong bar lengths in favor of the Core i9-10900K: At the multi-thread test, the bars for Core i9-9900K and Core i9-10900K are too long (looks like a smaller performance difference to the Ryzen 9 3950X). I did… Going off of hardware Unboxed test, if we consider it all, the 3900X is behinds the 9900K by 5-7% specifically at 1080P, and like 1-3% at 4K. The single threaded speed performance difference is negligible. Maybe zen3 will bring upgrades for her rig, maybe not. Gaming. Biggest disappointment: 10980XE. For gaming, amd and intel both have huge improvements vs what I’ve got now. Between a r5 5600x and r9 3950x there's not going to be a perceivable difference in gaming. Hey guys, I know that this comparison is all over the internet but I can’t seem to find any answers about which one would pertain best to my specific… Better upgrade paths, better performance in non-gaming situations such as graphical or simulation based work even against a 5. Well the i9 9900K is still the gaming king and I doubt the 3950x will be any better than the 3900x, since modern games struggle to utilise 8 cores, let alone 16 cores and 32 threads. This actually replicates itself across the games, CPUs, and GPUs. 0 GHZ 8 core boost, 3. At my 3440x1440 resolution and the latest 1. Current set up is an i9-9900k, RTX 2080, Asus Rog Maximus XI Hero & 32 GBs of DDR4-3200 RAM I can get a Ryzen 5 7600X & Gigabyte B650M DS3H for around $320. 264 on-timeline performance, the AMC 3900x or 3950x will supercede the i9-9900kf? Not sure about the 3900X, but the 3950X yes. So go ahead and buy the 5800X3D. So 10920x overclocked to 5gh should match or even outperform 9900k in gaming while at the same time providing more pci lanes for drives or second gpu. 5ghz of a 3700x should be around 5. 3950x or 9900k gaming/streaming/recording 1440p I am replacing my current 7700k and 1080fe with a new system. Based on 404,393 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X and the Intel Core i9-9900K, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,476 CPUs. Posted by u/johnny87auxs - 2 votes and 77 comments The 9900k is rated for 95w but pulls way more than that, especially overclocked it can reach to 150w or more. The i9-9900K is an obsolete processor that has been supplanted by the newer and cheaper i7-10700K. Use the 9900k for gaming and other things that need the clock speed advantage, you will almost certainly notice a difference between the intel and AMD in gaming and clock speed sensitive applications. Just. The 7900X has more memory channels, but has a slower interconnect mesh, and uses more power. Here's the thing, intel is still considered the best for high-end gaming (like the 9900k) but AMD is best for multi-tasking and general purpose. 9900k(s) still exists for top of the line gaming builds as the 3700/3900/3950x fall behind in single core speed. Gaming 3900X vs 9900K for 4K gaming This also means that Zen2 has slightly better IPC than a 9900k considering they (in theory) have comparable single core performance while the 3950x is clocked . Sure intel is due for a new cpu gen, but it still holds up. That may contribute to the worse GPU frametimes and FPS average more than the CPU difference. Crypto The 9900K still wins in gaming by a good margin over the 3950X. 4M subscribers in the buildapc community. The result, once both clock + memory tuned, the 3950X actually closed the perf gap by 1%. Posted by u/PleaseLetThisName - 6 votes and 7 comments Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Intel really needs SLI to work well for this processor to have a niche. Both the 3700X and 9900K will provide a good gaming experience, up to you if the extra 10-15% in performance is worth the money. Best gaming: 9900k/9900KS. I understand the 9900K's gaming advantage over the new AMD 3000 CPU's is only relevant when CPU performance becomes a factor at "lower resolutions", although as I'm playing exclusively at 1440P UW and 4K, it appears there will be 1-2 FPS difference at most between the 3000 series and the 9900k? 3950x is still an amazing CPU. If gaming is the sole use-case, those few percentages are very expensive. [HUB] AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs. Best high-end workstation: 3970X/3960X (honorable mention). however if your doing other things like rendering stuff and 3d work than the 5950x seems like a better value for a 100bucks less it has more cores (performance) and does not lack gaming performance vs the 12900k. The 9900K is almost universally faster, unless your workload can use more than 8 cores. 9900k is still ahead when it comes to raw gaming performance due to the better single core performance. You can try it with any processor you have. There may be cases where 3900X gets ahead but those will be exceedingly rare until games start utilizing 20+ threads which won't happen in the next 3-5 years, probably longer. If I am planning to play games optimized for console and multitasking, the i9-9900k is better. It's a reasonable compromise but if you're looking at it might as well get the 9700K as it clocks faster and has comparable all-core performace. This is of course paired with a 2080TI. 4 test results, raw and clock normalized for 3950X 16-core and 9900K 8-core at the same 4133MHz memory clock with Intel tested… 1. 60GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3. Cyberpunk was okay on it but had some heavy drops, just Watch Dogs: Legion really required a stronger cpu. 6M subscribers in the Amd community. e. 9900k is a great cpu for gaming especially when OC'd to 5ghz, but a 5600X definitely has higher FPS at stock vs stock, a 9900K OC may match or beat in some games but a 5600X oc will probably surpass it once again (some people can hit 4. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. 7. Honestly, the i9 9900K seems outdated compared to the Ryzen 9 3900X. Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 6 votes and 13 comments 9900K makes no sense, 10700K is the same thing but on a newer socket. But HUB did a OC + tuned 9900KS vs 3950X awhile ago. 9 GHZ 12 core boost, 3. According to Hardware unboxed the 9900k is 5% faster than a 3900x on average (In gaming), so the gap has closed quite a bit, but AMD still falls behind a little. A fast clocked quad core CPU would return similar results. so no real advantage there unless AMD rolls out with a 5GHz part, which I sincerly doubt. I have both, a 9900K setup for my gaming rig and the wife streams with a 2700x (which is now great value). a great CPU but its not that future proof especially since future games will be utilizing high core count as all next gen consoles will have AMD The 5800X3D is faster in gaming in most cases when it is up against the 5950X which is the newer version of your current cpu. 0. the I9 9900K is def. If using a 95W low-midrange air cooler for the Intel chip vs a fat AIO on Ryzen resulted in changing the winner then is that more or less fair The 10900k vs the 3950x ok they are about the same price but if your going to compare the 9900k against something it should be something that is the same price range. For $750 (3950X) you have the Core i9-10940X for $799. Best small Business/Hobbyist: 3950X. Example: 4. At the single 3950x runs about 100MHz lower than 3900x on all core load. Ryzen is faster at the same clock speed, but the 9900K will clock faster which nullifies the advantage. :P Also, seems like the differential is much closer at 1440p gaming (For example Deus Ex Mankind Divided only 3 FPS lower for 3900X, ie. If you're looking to spend $500+ on a gaming CPU, the best choice is still the 9900K. 6 GHz Intel Core i9 9900K with 8-cores against the 3. The difference between between using an INTEL gaming PC or using an AMD gaming PC is single digits for all resolutions. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. You'd get similar results from a 9700k manually overclocked to 5. The 3950x should be well beyond the 9900k. So essentially, what you're saying is that outside of H. I don't think he did the 10900K vs 3950X OC + tuned yet. If you’re keen on AMD I’d go with the 3700X at most, it’s usually a few percent slower than the 3900X at the moment. For PC gaming news and discussion! AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Review Video The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. 60GHz is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. i honestly think the 12900k is great but the 5800x3d will be the fastest gaming processer hands down and the 5950x is simply overkill for just gaming. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Even when the difference in most productivity cases is significantly higher in favour of Intel than AMD had in gaming. Upgrade to a 5000x series Ryzen and you’ll outperform the 9900K. A 4700x/5700x/whatever it's called would probably hit much, much closer to the 9900k/10900k with just that alone - let alone the improvements to IPC/clock speeds. There would be no point upgrading and wasting all that money in my opinion. 27v FTW!) and Dram tuning with 1:1 fclk I've pulled within a single-digit FPS gap off the 9900k while at the same time torpedoing everything else outside of gaming over the 9900k, for the same price. Conclusion. Honestly neither. Now a 3950x wrecks the 9900K and KS in productivity but if we are talking gaming only, for current CPU’s a $700 9900K + mobo + ram seems appealing for a gamer versus just $750 for a CPU. 6. I managed to get hold of a test rig on ebay for £500 which had the ryzen 3950x with an msi x470 pro gaming and 16gb ram. Or check it out in the app stores Home; Popular; TOPICS. And I don't think the 3950X will beat the 9900K when it comes to producing the highest possible framerates in as many titles as possible, while also being more expensive than the 9900K. The 5800X3D is quite a bit faster then the cpu you have now, which makes sense. While the 5950X is faster it is to be the last high end CPU on the AM4 platform so I would rather wait till Zen 4 to upgrade if you're in need of an increase across the board. The difference between 2080 Ti and 3080, regardless of INTEL or AMD system scales exactly the same. Reply reply Games should be more threaded by then but bear in mind if you buy the 9900K now then for a couple of years the extra power will be sitting in your PC unused. So since the 5950X is faster then the 3950X in gaming. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Try researching 8700k vs 9900k on youtube in demanding games like red dead redemption. I was wondering at the same price between 990K and 3900X which of the two was better performing for minecraft (therefore single core performance) and I think it is the 9900K. Basically, the 3950X is not actually intended in any way to be a "high end gaming chip" in the first place. This is why I pulled the trigger on the 3900x over the 9900k. 3950x can do it really well tho if you want to save some bucks, that thing is a beast on gaming/streaming, the player may lose a few fps but it's not that much, they will still be really high, the thing with the 9900k is that it skips many frames on the stream side because it just can't render them in time if you are going for x264 slow with a Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Posted by u/Ohboyiwannaeat - 2 votes and 10 comments 132 votes, 120 comments. All K and X units are, although overclocking an X is questionable at best. Also has PCIe gen 4, really fast storage can benefit some work tasks. Yeah indeed. From the benchmarks I've seen for your uses, the 9900k is comparable with the 3700x. Games are not making use of the extra threads therefore the 9700K and 10700K perform similarly. Save some cash and still get performance better than the 9900k. He’ll no don’t keep the the 9900k it’s old platform the new socket and motherboard is the way to go just gotta be patient or just go amd bro get a 3950x or 3900 since amd is for sure going to release the 4000 series cpu that will work with the current amd platform and they don’t hAve a cpu shortage intel Sucks right now Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I benched a 3070 with a 3700X and an i9-9900K at 1080p and there was a massive improvement in games Simply because the 3600 has eliminated the 9600k from the ~$200 price bracket. Games will always prefer single core raw performance and low memory latency. Now drop 100MHz and try dropping voltage. Watching the reviews, I’m now considering waiting for 15th gen or amd’s next gen chips. Valheim Genshin 3950x vs 5950x . ). but it might get behind in video rendering due to thread deficit. Although the KF is sort of a bad idea, as you miss out on the iGPU. Best ultra Budget: 3000G/1200/1300X/3200g. If you are deciding between 3700X and 9900K based on the reviews where they test them out on big coolers, you might get diminishing returns on your investment if you choose to pair a 9900K with something like L9i or C7G over 3700X. I see what you are saying. 1440p/60, 1440p/144, 1440p/165, 4k/60 those two CPU's will deliver identical performance. However the 3700x outpaces it for things like rendering. 8M subscribers in the Amd community. Even the 9900ks was much cheaper at its peak so the comparison barely stands. For gaming performance an overclocked 9600k will be the same as the 3950X, especially at 4k, which makes this benchmark useless. But at multicore it's up ahead like 30-40%. The fact that it is 3950X user here. Aka the bottleneck of all 4k gaming PCs is the GPU. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. Also Check out this video talking about that with a gaming GPU, few faster cores can often beat out MANY more slower cores too (The $300 vs $4000 CPU challenge). I am currently trying to decide on the best approach for future proofing and making sure my system is good for what I do. If your kid needs an upgrade maybe pass down the 3950x to him and get yourself a 5950x. I've seen some benchmarks and reviews for both the 3900x and 3950x and am wondering if the 3900x is enough for higher streaming presets, or if I'm going to wish I had more (3950x, *4900x*, etc. 0 or 4. However, the 3900X is lagging behind the 9900K all the way down to RX 580 (230 vs 225; 210 vs 203, 164 vs 160) even though at these numbers there should not be a CPU bottleneck. 47 votes, 38 comments. So if you are getting the GPU also for gaming, keep it, if you are getting the GPU for encoding, go for a lower end 1050TI card and pocket the savings or upgrade cpu. But then again, your only upgrade path will be 9900K(S). Control was running perfectly fine on my i7 4790k. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. You can look up gaming benchmark comparisons. If the 3950X is better it's only as a result of much tighter binning that allows higher loaded core clocks while gaming. 8GHZ all core boost. Most fun to overclock: 3950x (both fun and infuriating) and 9900k/9900KS. 3959X will still be great for years to come. The original benchmark graph for the first benchmark comparison between Comet Lake and Zen 2 (shown by Videocardz) is using wrong bar lengths in favor of the Core i9-10900K: At the multi-thread test, the bars for Core i9-9900K and Core i9-10900K are too long (looks like a smaller performance difference to the Ryzen 9 3950X). If you’re using the 3900x now and performance is fine, stick with it. Faster supported IF speed will also help things immensely, as well. Granted battlefield 2042 isn't the most optimized game, but the fact that the difference is very noticeable speaks to how well this new CPU can carry you several years more down the road vs 9900k . Skill's most premium 16GB memory kits, the Trident Z Neo DDR4-3600 CL14. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a… The real performance difference is probably a lot lower than the tests show because youre usually in the GPU limit which results in only 3-4% difference between the cheaper Ryzen 3600 and the i9 9900K. Are you asking if you should upgrade from the 9900KS to the 5950X for gaming ? Then no that would be a complete waste of money. 0GHz and save $$$. If you are on the edge wait to see if Intel price drops and then if you are just gaming it might be a slightly better deal for the 9900k. Intel chips also don't come with a stock cooler, which is an additional expense. 3950x will absolutely destroy the 6850k in things that require those many cores, usually more productive tasks. Crypto In my main gaming rig, i will be running a 3950x cpu, 2080 ti and what not. Look at 4k benchmarks with older CPUs vs newer ones. I think for the vast majority of people the two smart choices for a gaming CPU are the 3600 in the mid-range and the 9900K for high-end builds. Or sell the 3950x and use the money to buy your kid a 5900x for gaming and you get yourself a 5950x. Numbers are made up, just to represent what having to stay close to the TDP means for OUT OF THE BOX clocks when you add more and more cores and expect all of them to generate same amount of heat. 2 now enables DXNAVI by default for RDNA1 GPUs, bringing DirectX 11/10 RDNA2 optimizations! AMD could of course enable X399 support to get cheaper motherboards in play, drop a 16C 3955X for $700 (perfectly reasonable considering it's R3-tier silicon vs the A++ grade silicon on the 3950X), and completely shit all over Intel here. Reply reply But. If you’re running a lower end GPU then the GPU bottleneck will prevent the i9 from showing its full potential. $480+$100 for a +5% difference but a -30 to -40% multicore difference for the 9900K, the 3900X is almost a no brainer. All about small form factor PCs – decreasing size and maximizing space efficiency! The 3900x can perform quite well with OC ram, it puts it up there with a stock 9900K with power limits disabled cooled by a AIO so it can boost up to its max (technically not truly stock). From my research 3700x already Power consumption (stock) GN Blender test: i9 9900k - 93W i9 10900k - 129W 3950x - 136W 3900x - 150W Of course this is application and time dependent, here's another from the same review from a shorter benchmark: Power consumption (stock) GN cinebench r20 i9 9900k 154W i9 10900k 200W 3950x - 138W 3900x - 148W Dead On Arrival: Intel i9-10900X CPU Review & Benchmarks vs. 9 on the intel one, somewhere along those lines. That was surprisingly, since common believe is that Ryzen doesn't OC well. For 4K gaming, your GPU does most of the work so I would invest there. 3GHz lower. I am looking at two systems on sale at the moment, one of which has the 9700k and the other boasting a 9900k, for a far steeper price tag. If it's on gaming or 50/50, go for the 5900x, otherwise, if gaming is second to productivity, go for the 3950x. 4ghz all core OC (1. Other than gamers comparing specs and synthetic benchmarks I don't see the use case for 3950x. A single image at 1080p resolution on the i5-2500k would take for example 5 minutes this has now been reduced to 15 seconds. It’s one of the fastest processors for gaming at the moment next to the binned ks and AMDs 3900x and 3950x With 8700K you will lose a bunch of productivity performance vs 3700X or 9900K. So recently I switched out my mobo and CPU from an aorus z390 master and 9900k@5ghz to an aorus x570 master and a 3950x (undervolted, PBO off). the 5950X as a "gaming-only" CPU makes zero financial sense when you can get 98-99% of its performance with offerings half as cheap. Rip the disc, run it through Handbrake, backup the raw Blu Ray rip (seriously do this -- if you ever realize you fucked up your encodes or have data loss, you won't have to rip the discs again, which is like 30m per disc on a portable drive), copy the compressed/encoded file into my Plex library. 257K subscribers in the sffpc community. These graphs are using the 3900xt and 3950x as a baseline, so the graph implies the benefit of the new architecture of the 16 core 5950x compared to the 3950x is greater in gaming scenarios than that of the equivalent architecture change for the 12 core 5900x. Note that my time in supercruise was less during the 3950X run, and that time was instead spent in the more graphically-stressful ice ring. Other user claimed that a 9900K benefits from ram scaling as much as a 3900x does. Intel i9 9900k, Ryzen 3950x, or ThreadRipper 3990x? Is 83-89 safe temp for ryzen 5 5500 when gaming? Apr 30, 2024 · Compare the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X with the Intel Core i9-9900K in terms of core types, core counts, frequencies, and cache capacities, along with their overclocking, PCIe, and DDR support. It's faster than the 3900X and 3950X for gaming. I9-9900k is almost same price with 5600x but it has 8 cores 16 threads. 3950x is propably a bit overkill, especially for the price. 3900X, 3950X, 9900K I was confused for a moment because AMD is red and Intel blue normally and they are reversed here. Im building a pc soon and I already have most of the parts except a few and I still haven’t ordered the cpu, is the 3950x worth it for gaming or the 3900x good enough and how do the numbers compare in gaming wise for both ? 9900K for pure high refresh rate gaming with a high end GPU. Thus even for pure gaming only I'd argue that a 3900x is a better buy than 9900k. 0 9900k (50% more cinbench multicore, almost identical corona scores, 50% more in luxmark, 31% more in blender, and 30% more in vray), cheaper motherboards, amongst some of them. . Everything about the Ryzen 9 3900X performs better than the i9 9900K except for gaming but it only falls short by a hair. 4 AGESA bios, 4. Imo if you want the best gaming CPU but that still high end get the 3700x the value is insane. $500 vs. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC… That's what I do, for 1080 content anyway. See full list on tomshardware. Between a 9900k and a 3700x, it's an each choice if we don't care about price, on paper AMD cpus outperform Intel CPUs on the same frequency, because of the IPC increases, so on paper 4. Because that is literally the only scenario where you'll see a 9900k@5GHz barely, just barely beating a 3900x with tuned memory. Without the iGPU the 9900K loses out on one of its biggest strengths which is h. If we are comparing CPUs at similar pricing, it would be more fair to compare the 3900x to the 9900k. Posted by u/LeonardIV - 1 vote and 3 comments 6850k is fine for games. Will the 3950x be a better gaming cpu than the 9900k and possibly have better fps paired with 2080ti? Archived post. 7Ghz) . This is true for both 2080 Ti and 3080. It depends a lot on what you do on your system. Honestly, you'd be better off going with something like a Ryzen 7 3700X or 3800X. I think the Ryzen 9 3900x will be much better overall. Like a 3900x or a 2950x It seems odd to go with a mid tier cpu unless its to try to show something that will lose pretty much every single time 9900k/3900x seems to accomplish the same for less money in gaming/light apps , and 10940x/10980xe offer similar speeds but with a whole lot more storage & expansion flexibility. While I agree that the silicon is a bit better on the 3950x, this 100MHz is making a whole lot of difference. You'd be paying for a 9900K but only getting the 9700K or maybe even 9600K level of performance in games until you can fully utilise that power. Cause Reddit. My advice would be to go for the 3700x if it's within your field of consideration. Business, Economics, and Finance. I understand the 9900K's gaming advantage over the new AMD 3000 CPU's is only relevant when CPU performance becomes a factor at "lower resolutions", although as I'm playing exclusively at 1440P UW and 4K, it appears there will be 1-2 FPS difference at most between the 3000 series and the 9900k? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. True yet still, I was still impressed from some older 2 core games like the first Tomb Raider, the 3950X was faster or the racers from 2011-12! Why not? 4k is "the great equalizer". Though if we were to give Reddit based advice - get Intel 14700 or don't even bother !!!111!1 3950x is still an amazing CPU. However look at the 3700x its meeting or beating both of those cpus in games. For the streaming rig, which is a ITX system due to the limitations of the PC case, I have a spare i9 9900k that I was planning on running. I do a lot of video editing and converting (mostly 1080p, not really at 4K), so I’m interested in cutting down on render times where possible. 3950x = close to the 3900x 8 core and 12 core boost, lower all core boost. however, if you are not in a very much hurry, I would say wait for the 3950x that is coming this september (16core, 4. The 9900K has no stock cooler, requires a huge cooler for stock operation, a huger one for overclocking, and yes, it is unlocked. Generally 9900K is a better gaming CPU. Most of the Ryzen's 16 cores will be wasted - iRacing uses only 2 heavily. The 3950X is NOT a gaming CPU. -3% contrary to 1080p -19% - according to Guru3D; and Shadow of Tomb Raider -8% at 1080p and +3% at 1440p). I know the 5600x has better single thread performance however the i9 9900k is better in multitasking. Both Intel and AMD both are great, even for gaming, it just depends on what u want to do and what you like better. with the 3950X being a few percent better for $250 more. In virtually every other scenario i. The performance in 3ds max rendering is mental. a 9900K is still the fastest gaming CPU you can buy (at least until the 10900k is available). Intel Core i9-13900K: 1080p, 1440p & 4K Gaming Benchmarks r/Amd • AMD driver 23. 1. but it does memory tune really well. Push it to redline and optimize voltage. If you are talking 100% RAW GAMING FPS, the 9900K is the winner, even beating out many other higher core count Intel parts, due to the higher core count chips not clocking as high, but we are talking in the 5-10% range, like the difference of 105 FPS vs 98 FPS, so you have to ask yourself if the lowered potential of FPS is an issue for how much more you get bang for your buck on the AMD side Here are Geekbench 4. It's not a drastic performance difference gaming on the 9900K vs 3900X. I have a 3950x and had planned to upgrade to a 14700k or 14900k when they came out. Even if you assume a gaming clock of 4ghz on a 3900x (in reality its more) a 400mhz gain, assuming linear performance improvements still gets you only 98% of a 9900ks. The 3950X CPU frametime numbers, in general, look worse than the 9900KS numbers. cbpqmh pmemh jdtrv zzhrg vrgl gbgm iucr tntnfhi epji oukvd kdl qink etsi apmztdh ittp