Best audiophile vinyl recordings reddit. (Figures IIRC, can't find citation at the moment.

Best audiophile vinyl recordings reddit So far in my trip down the Spotify playlist, I think I like the 2015/16 Alan Gilbert + NY Philharmonic performance the best. Even a Crosley/Victrola/etc. ) Yes, classical recordings and (re-)issues by Deutsche Grammophon tend to be really good, whether it is on CD or vinyl. There are few reasons to listen to new music on vinyl, in my opinion. The streaming experience is great. And yes, I have records from my father which were not treated well, and yes these have very audible surface noise. Sometimes I want a record on vinyl as a keepsake. Other speakers are a bit more romantic-sounding, and help gloss over problems with the record while providing a more old-school sound. Particularly Archiv, Hyperion and Naxos are good. This isn't an inherent benefit of vinyl. But what does that actually mean? The Classics series are really nice budget audiophile records. Those vinyl pressings are usually expensive. The Tone Poets are fun rarities, and I’ve never had a pressing issue. RCA was a major seller of home stereo equipment and the RCA record label was a leader in high quality recordings to play on these very capable home systems. Streaming might be best for background music while you are doing other things. As for your question, I don’t even know what “audiophile” vinyl means. Been collection vinyl for a while, but I'm fairly new to the whole "high quality audiophile" game. where for example MJ Thriller has CD master and separate vinyl master. Those of us who are of a certain age will use all three. I realize some may think the choice of piece is cliche and well-worn, but hey, we like what we like. Classic Records and Analogue Productions are two audiophile reissue companies that have been known to release records as heavy as 200g lately. I remember getting Ride The Lightning for $5. Between vinyl and SACD, I buy SACD. IMO it's worth investing in a separate headshell/cart/stylus combo for recording purposes, I've personally had good results with an Ortofon 2m Red but there's a ton You’d want the record temp around 80-98F, any more than that could damage, up to you though, just drawing from my experience doing lathe cut vinyl, haven’t done this to fix a personal record, just something I’ve noticed usually flattens the record. My problem is the jackets. I used to have vinyl records throughout the 90s. However, it is a imperfect medium but I find that is part of the charm to listening to vinyl. Here's another way to look at this. I have quite a sizeable vinyl collection, probably about 500, containing some titles from audiophile labels such as Mofi and Audio Fidelity, original pressings etc. The intention is to listen to albums with the best sound quality I can get for my price point (under $400). I have never got a bad pressing from MOV. They able to make the records a little more dynamic (if the master-recording allows it), because there’s much more space between the groove’s circumvent (it’s one groove moving towards the center in a spiral) Basically it’s more luxury, more vinyl, thus, more fun. The very end (coda I think it's called) is played much faster than most of what you hear now. The nice warm vinyl sound is partially due to inaccurate reproduction in the medium and in a strange way it's a experience. The best sound in my opinion was produced by the Philips and Decca labels. It's work to maintain records and a turntable but I find it satisfying. DSD recordings have a wonderful sampling rate and are sensationally good. The other thing I would add about vinyl is that if you are into vintage recordings, then adding vinyl as part of your collection makes a lot more sense. It dates back to manufacturing of vinyl records. When a MoFi is considered the best or one of the best, it's pretty much always worth getting if it's close to MSRP. I grew up learning classics from vinyl records and then from CDs during the golden age of the 70's and 80's when new recordings were pumped out weekly by the major labels. From my experience, starting to get albums on vinyl also has a very positive behavioural impact to music listening habits. I am looking at a couple different products on amazon that are polyethylene inner sleeve but some of the negative feedback on some of them make me worried. But, I used to buy vinyl because is was cheaper than a CD and it lasted longer than a cassette tape. You may find that you consistently prefer the CD, or most of the time the vinyl. And by decent I don't mean expensive, but merely not defective with half way clean records. Any preference there? r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. There is no tape involved. Here's what I have: Technics SL-1200 mk1 Turntable TCC TC-750LC Phono Preamp Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 KRK Rokit 5 Studio Monitors The problem with many of the original CDs is that the record companies were in a hurry to put out content so they didn't take time to make sure they actually used the correct master tapes. He has a McIntosh speaker. Actually, classical recording and mastering has been taken quite seriously not only by Deutsche Grammophon but also by labels such as: Archiv, most Philips records and Sony as well. Couldn't agree more. Since this is my first true audiophile level set up, I've been having a blast going through my records and listening to how they sound. I have a large CD collection (as well as albums on Blu-ray, SACD, DVDA) and some of them already have disc rot and no longer work. The dual pockets let you store the vinyl outside the jacket so no ring wear and to minimize dust; VSS also has single pockets if you prefer to store the vinyl in the jacket. Considering the age of this technology, it shouldn't sound this good. You're getting high quality mastering with heavy vinyl and a thick well made card stock jacket, as well as a rice paper anti-static inner sleeve. Listening to music on a little bluetooth speaker just wouldn't cut it in the 70's. • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. My record box of The Swing Era, The Music Of 1939-1940 by David D Cavanaugh and Bill Miller, Such High Quality and some of the best recreations of the songs from that era that it competes with some of the original 78s. Vinyl sounds better on cheaper, off the rack (Best Buy type) sound systems that are still using 1970s type technology in the amplifier section, which was designed for playing records and other analog sources. g. The vinyl sounded better, there was more "air"/space around the instruments and voices, and the soundstage was deeper than the Redbook CD versions as well. Our primary goal is insightful discussion of home audio equipment, sources, music, and concepts. Cons: Vinyl, like any physical medium will deteriorate over time (even CDs, Google: 'disk rot'). It's worth understanding the origins of the "Original Master Recording" concept in answering the question. 5 – Mahler Mar 27, 2024 · Sounding not unlike a warm, dusty vinyl pressing rescued from a pile of 70s psychedelic records, you'd do well to place this music in a time or a place but we think that's no bad thing. , no Mofi records, 24-bit CDs, etc. Generally speaking I would trust a record to last longer than a CD if handled properly. It actually works fairly well. Symphony No. The best part of vinyl for me was getting cheap, used records for like $5. I've never felt the need to use more than a carbon brush or microfiber cloth before, but that won't do the job on some of these. Some releases like Dylan and the dead probably take their vinyl master from the CD master versions. Split the file into individual track files then compress the files losslessly. Since the CD-ROM came down to affordable prices I started using that and forgot about the vinyl records. Another way to get at the same question -- some speakers are really detailed and insightful, but they also tend to highlight any problems with older records (or newer recordings). I def think vinyl tops lossless streaming if dealing with pre digital recording era. Own a turntable? Get this on vinyl for the complete experience. If you want audiophile recordings get in on the prestige series of the blues through QRP/Acoustic sounds/ analogue productions. What is your best, most "audiophile quality" sounding record you know of? I'm pumped because I recently invested in a Technics SL-1210mk2 with a brand new Audio-Technica 120e cartridge. Dire Straits: Brothers in Arms—One of the first all-digital recording, and still one of the best. Classical music on reputable labels will really show off your Audiophile (always good but pricey): Analogue Productions Mobile Fidelity (MoFi) Music Matters Orignial Recordings Group (ORG) Pure Pleasure Records Speakers Corner Good to Great (reliable) : Ace Records Light in the Attic Monk Music on Vinyl Numero Group Original Jazz Classics (OJC) Rhino Third Man Records The problem with the new/very mint records is that they might not sound the best. When playing a CD it disappears inside the drawer, while with vinyl you see the stylus on the spinning record, which gives it a real physicality. . If a recording sounds better with a bit of mid range bias or harmonic distortion, it should be recorded that way, not added incidentally as an artifact of the playback medium. Today your best bet is going to be vinyl. I am convinced that vinyl, an analog medium, produces the best results with analog recordings. I love the way he does the 3rd movement and the speed of the 4th movement. Digital potentially offers the best sound, proper multichannel recording and so on. I've never thought a CD or any other digital format sounded better than vinyl. 1. I just switch between the two. I own one Diana Krall record and one Steely Dan record. If you have recordings nobody else can access anywhere, please consider posting them online. Vinyl offered less noise, longer tracks and ultimately, stereo. I don't have the knowledge to fully explain all of the reasons why this is the case, perhaps someone else can. Also look into GD time machine it's a lot of fun. Warm vinyl sound. Find a recording studio and ask them to do the work for you. One other note: my old process (using a cheap commercial system for vinyl recording) generated WAV files, which seem to take up a large amount of storage space on the PC. The dynamic range of vinyl is about 75dB, CD is 96dB, SACD is 120dB, and the human ear picks up 130dB. Using a lathe a lacquer master is created. I've got all of the hardware setup and plugged in to the computer just fine, but I'm a complete stranger to to the audio recording/editing world. Kevin gray tone poet) can top streaming. Please note that it isn't because a vinyl record was cut using Digital Masters (either Digital Tape, CD [common thing to happen back in the 1990's] or Digital Files in a Computer) that it has lower quality than it's 100% analog equivalents from the past decades; In fact, when using Digital intermediaries for mastering vinyl it's actually I bought it on vinyl after realizing all my records sounded better than streaming and was actually disappointed! I don't know if it's because it's just a single LP and not a double (all my double LPs sound incredible), but I was really hoping for a supreme audiophile experience and the vinyl just fell short. The separation and presence of each instrument on both recordings is AMAZING! There are also some recording companies that do fantastic job with their material. Some mixing/mastering engineers actually have an empty vinyl record to record the noise of vinyl and mix that into the sound to mask it. They are repressing them right now and they say back ordered but you still can order them. I can imagine that younger folks would not feel that way, though. I sold my turntable and about 500 records three years ago, and I haven't looked back. 10,000 Maniacs: MTV Unplugged—The maniacs at their best, well captured. CD and Vinyl might be best for quiet serious music listening. I like digipacks and gatefolds for CDs better. But it won't do any justice to the sound quality vinyl is capable of delivering. A record from 50 years ago can still sound great, as long as it’s been stored properly and physically treated well… whereas many CD’s from early in the CD era now suffer from disc rot, and are completely unplayable due to oxygen permeating the plastic layer and eating away the metal layer. Though someone wore the hell out if it before me, it still sounded great. I think they tend to use Record Industry. Recordings that were made analog and mastered for analog, deserve to be heard in analog. For equipment, setup, or troubleshooting questions, please ask in our stickied Weekly Questions Thread. Joy Division "Unknown Pleasures" with that iconic cover or Miles Davis "Kind of Blue" are great examples. I was wondering if my current equipment would be sufficient or if I need additional equipment. Then use the best turntable/cartridge you can afford. In my experience the vinyl is always perfectly flat and silent with nice mastering (and affordable!). I then let the record dry and then after an evening letting the record dry, I run a felt brush parallel with the grooves over and over and am still finding a lot of dust being pulled up that never seems to end. 2) Some records to my ears sound better on vinyl but not all. I have found this is the best for wet cleaning. So once you've got four or so records in the cart, the shipping per record ends up at like $6 each. However I do NOT just buy vinyl because I like the ritual or want a large keepsake of an album I have always enjoyed. It is not that vinyl records sound better, it's that vinyl records are generally better mastered compared to their digital counterparts. I buy mostly from Japanese sites, and it's like $17 shipping for the first record and a few bucks more for each additional record. There are also some excellent recordings that will never make it to CD or official hi-res release. If you're a big classical/jazz listener, SACD is completely worth it. The vinyl "warmth" is present on the digital version and so are the clicks, pops, and everything else. Vinyl records have difficulty reproducing sounds above 16 kHz. New vinyl generally sounds nicer than old vinyl because the materials and technologies have improved in the past 30 years. As everyone else has said, recording to Audacity via your Scarlett is the way to go. So I'm hoping you all could point me in the direction of some of the best labels for high quality vinyl? Could be new reissue labels or labels that have new releases. Streaming will eventually be a lot of people's first choice now and in the future. MFSL are the most inconsistent. was hoping to be able to order through amazon prime but if i end up having to go to my local record shop (30 minute drive) it is what it is. However, the lower noise floor feels unnatural to us, because many recordings don't even have that low of a noise floor. The vinyl in my set up sounds astoundingly clear and vivid, but has this extra sense of texture, density, solidity. This subreddit is for the budget minded audiophile that wants to grow out of soundbars, boomboxes, mini systems, portable bluetooth, lifestyle speakers, and PC peripheral branded audio solutions. the lower frequencies have to be reduced when the disc is cut, and your phono amp will restore the signal to ‘normal’ EQ levels. Its honestly ridiculous sounding to me… crazy wide soundstage with all kinds of details i didnt realize were there when casually listening to it back when it originally came out. XTC: Skylarking—The pop version of DSOTM. Early CD's had alot of dynamic range then the loudness war started and it got so bad that a late 1800's medium has better quality. CDs and vinyl are mastered differently because of the physical limitations of a vinyl disc. A note here would be that doesn't make newer recordings not worth owning on vinyl, but by and large it's unnecessary (isn't all of this though?!) If a song is 0's and 1's at the time of recording and mastering, wouldn't playing it back that way make the most sense? Footnote: One of the most reliable reissue houses is ACME, based in Hastings, UK. Redbook CDs, no audiophile recordings on either side used (e. Better dynamic range, less surface noise. For inner sleeves I use either the 3 mil rice paper sleeves from Vinyl Storage Solutions or the Diskeeper rice paper sleeves. More presence, like the drum kits and guitars etc are cutting through the mix, like they are "right (Don’t mind the fact it’s on Spotify… I know that vinyl is superior lol) Even Spotify’s limited bit depth is objectively superior to the best vinyl pressings. Playback format has nothing to do with the original recording. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. I much prefer the sound of the digital version as the vinyl sounds muddy, with a narrower soundstage and reduced highs and lows. One thing you shouldn't overlook is your cartridge and stylus, DJ carts are not always ideally suited to the task when sound quality is the goal. No really, I listen to whatever I want to listen to. No tape tracks are stacked. So we prefer vinyl because it can make albums sound more coherent. Vinyl records were recorded mostly in mono (one channel) or stereo (two channels). Too much bass is handled by the RIAA EQ curve and the role of the phono preamp, both of which can be done imperfectly and make the experience of a vinyl record sound different. Just depends on the production. Even cleaning the record and stylus lends a degree of anticipatory pleasure to it. Like, I have records with pops and clicks and crackles with a 9 bit equivalent signal to noise ratio, and I have records that don’t have that with a lower noise floor. this makes your phono amp very important to the sound of vinyl and why people pay tons of money for expensive tube preamps. If you like it, get it. Vinyl may introduce inaccuracies that some find subjectively pleasant. If you do a needledrop and record vinyl to digital, the playback sounds almost identical to vinyl. Turntables are a complete system from the main deck itself to the cartridge and stylus, tone arm and the phono pre amp they are paired with. I also have some old vinyl that sounds amazing, and some old vinyl that sounds like garbage. • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with… Think it is the best recording of Furtwangler, at least the best I could find. It just seems balanced and crisp through my speaker setup. Hey everyone. I recently picked up a copy of Alex G’s “God Save the Animals” on vinyl and it may be my favorite album in my 800+ record collection. This got me thinking about the best way to clean them. Vinyl is cool. Green Day, Dookie Kevin Gray cut. That said, in some cases there is reason to prefer recordings mastered for vinyl. There are many other labels doing this kind of thing, including the original labels in some cases (eg Blue Note Tone Poets and Classic Vinyl series), along with Analogue Productions, Rhino, and many others. As for dynamic range, most music has nowhere near the 75dB of dynamic range that vinyl records are capable of, that's not really an issue. As a result of the physical limitations of the medium 13 votes, 37 comments. My husband is an audiophile. Mapleshade records and Chesky come to mind. Best sources for new high quality records online Discussion I have recently "finished" my audio setup at home (Braun PS-500 + Marantz 2238b + ADS L710) and want to make sure I'm buying good pressings of the albums I want. So it's better to start off with a turntable like an AT-LP60X and a pair of powered speakers. Only the ones labeled Original Master Recordings are from original tapes. I don't consider vinyl better. Pink Floyd—Dark Side of the Moon—Because I'd loose credibility for not listing it. Sometimes digital is a bit "too perfect" as well. Yes ideally digital has advantages, but in the messy real world the source quality many of us listen to can be all over the map, and often the theoretical advantages of digital are not fully exploited in many recordings. 2M subscribers in the audiophile community. In simple terms the steps to create a vinyl record are (and still are) typically as follows (an apologies if I don't used the exact correct terms). It's coming up to my dad's birthday, and one thing he would absolutely love is all of his old vinyl records converted into a digital format. Hi! In the last year I have bought a a turntable and begun collecting vinyl records, and something that has been interesting me is the difference between digital and analog records. New releases of old recordings,half speed masters,coloured vinyl and 180g records are of little interest to me and I don't see the appeal or any particular sonic improvement. Even with engineered relevance via better mixes and masters, vinyl is and always has been a lossy medium, especially everything after the advent of preamp EQ curves - especially the nearly 100% adoption of the RIAA EQ curve and Columbia LP microgroove record standards. A vinyl record made from a great quality master can sound better than a digital source made from a lower quality master (or For Mahler recordings in modern sound, I think Tilson Thomas’s series with SF offers some of the best combination of hifi sound with great performances and interpretations, especially in S#2, 3, 4, 6 and 8. The label "audiophile quality" or even the fact that the record is 180gm is not dispositive of its quality. Also with vinyl records I tend play the whole record without skipping songs and feel more focused on the actual listening experience. Some of it sounds amazing--jazz recordings from the 50s and 60s are usually a good bet, Michael Jackson's records were always well-engineered. At this point if I’m going to buy vinyl, I try to find older pressings that have good reviews, if they’re available, or I just google “best vinyl pressing of [album]” and try to figure out which is best. I am looking to recording my vinyl collection into my computer. That master disc is then used to cast a stamper to press the vinyl. Currently, I use a 1/4 ratio of Iso alcohol to distilled water and a teaspoon of dish soap. I’m a big vinyl guy and have many records from audiophile labels. Since then I've spent a lot of money on gear to make my records sound their best. I have a Fluance RT85 turntable and a Pro-Ject Phono Box DC MM/MC Phono preamp. If it is worth keeping and saving for posterity, it makes sense to archive it in 24 bit. Or they may be very good. In this article, we will explore some of the best vinyl albums cherished by audiophiles for their exceptional sound quality, masterful mastering, and captivating musical artistry. Provided your turntable rig is up to snuff, with the price barrier to match. Buying presents for him is sort of a nightmare. I also own the 2010 vinyl re-release by "music on vinyl" and just compared that directly to the Sony version by flipping inputs back and forth (digital version is 256kb AAC). Some were quadraphonic (4 channel) recordings, but quadraphonic recordings were more expensive to produce, plus they required specially designed decoders and four channel amplifiers, which is why the format was so short lived. ). Some CDs were made from EQ'd masters used to cut vinyl, or they were 3rd or 4th generation tapes, not the original master tape. Pink Floyd – “The Dark Side of the Moon”: • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. My old Future Days CD has off-puttingly poor quality but the mid-00's Tago Mago is very good. You need to buy multiple records at once to balance out the shipping. Those records definitely beat any other versions I've heard. Feed this into a computer and record using Audacity at high resolution. I only bother to transfer vinyl that doesnt exist digitally already, then I use a record cleaning machine, thousands of dollars in analog playback and thousands more in digital conversion. However, whenever I play vinyl records on my 80s-era record player (Linn LP12/Linn Ittok LVII, Linn Adikt MM cartridge), I am consistently amazed by the remarkable sound quality. Tape offered the best audio quality if it was fast/wide enough and not redubbed too often. Has some of the best stereo imaging I've ever heard. Typically a good table is heavy and resistant to vibration and feedback, runs at a very steady and minimally wavering speed, picks up lots of detail without too much surface noise on good/clean records. At this point I often prefer the sound of vinyl records on my turntable to lots of my digital sources. I highly doubt you could tell the difference between a needledrop and a record being played. I do CD, digital, LP, whatever. It bursts with late-stage grandiosity and wears its influences on its sleeve, from opener Hush – a Pet Sounds lullaby with A Day In The Life warped orchestral line – to the bombastic Queen-style romp of Joining A Fanclub including a left-field nod to Roy Wood in the sparkling saxophones Finally there's the sound. Aug 1, 2023 · Vinyl records, with their warm sound and nostalgic charm, hold a special place in the hearts of audiophiles. Now I can get the same with CDs except I get benefit of copying them to my computer. The musicians are recorded to a master disc playing live. He’s into vinyl and we already have three record players, several amps and pedals in our house. The best way is to find a sound card with a high quality analog to digital converter. I enjoy several of these, but didn't know if the quality of recent releases was much better. just want to make sure i am getting ones that actually fit a 12" record. It’s the best that vinyl has to offer. I actually don't think that because it's on vinyl, it will sound better. Cassettes gave huge convenience (for the time) and, eventually, decent quality at the high end. They developed the "Living Stereo" recordings which were a great advance in analog recording science. suitcase player won't ruin your records -- the tales of them "destroying" vinyl are a debunked myth. It's better recordings sounding better. When streaming happened, and I could pay a single subscription and listen to basically anything, I forgot about CD-ROMs (audio CDs, I guess). Some of my favourite audiophile wise: RAM - Daft Punk All Yosi Horikawa stuff Bladerunner 2049 OST release Jazz at the Pawnshop 1 2 3 Buena Vista Social Club Gramatik - Beatz & Pieces Vol. Any playback format can support any format, cds handle higher frequencies than vinyl could ever achieve, you’re being lied too by the record companies they know the truth if vinyl was the best cd and mp3 would have never become a thing. The original tapes may be long gone and vinyl or tape copies in private hands may be the best remaining versions of the recordings. Yes, Vinyl has obvious limitations, but rumple and cracks are probably not what most Vinyl listeners in this forum experience at their home. Thanks! These are good suggestions. If it is about your *own* preferences, just try it out: listen to your favourite albums in an audiophile store, a showroom or in a show or in another audiophile's home. Funnily enough, one of my best sounding records is a used Emitt Rhodes record that isn’t 180g and The GD vinyl box sets like Cornell '77 or JGB 90's box have been mastered recently for better fidelity. Another Tears for Fears album has audible non-fill. For Everything Record Related. Sound and recording professionals will be able to address this with greater expertise but I'm convinced there is a difference between new recordings on new vinyl, old recordings on old vinyl (that's in good condition) and old recordings on new vinyl. Musicians like Ryo Fukui blew up over the last ten years partly because people took vinyl records that were hard to find in the states, digitized them, and posted them to youtube. Also something about having vinyl having a smoother wave then digital but now with 24bit 192000hz audio downloads this is hardly an issue just finding audiophile recording of what you want you want to listen to is. Aug 13, 2020 · Here’s a list — in no particular order — of 10 must-have LPs that really show what the vinyl format is capable of, in a wide range of musical genres, from classical to electronica. A vinyl record will physically last longer. There can't be ANY dust in the grooves. IMO the best use for LP playback is to listen to music up to the 1990s, listening to the original releases, pressed in the original country where the music was released. just wondering if anyone CD quality is 16 bit, giving you a noise floor of -96 db. If you like Vinyl then the discussion if over. Keepers was recorded live in an intimate club. Cassettes suck, vinyl is much better but now that high resolution streaming is a affordable option, seems to me vinyl (even though it’s possible to sound superior) isn’t worth it, unless you really like to collect record and like the nostalgia aspect… but just for pure sound quality, I feel like it’s so much more expensive that it’s The DR for Vinyl is kind’ve dumb as even the creator of the program says it was not made for vinyl because it is inaccurate. In fact, vinyl is in theory an objectively inferior technology, due to the inherent physical limitations created by the fact you are carving grooves into a piece of plastic. Rage Against The Machine, Evil Empire Music On Vinyl copy. Pixies, Surfer Rosa MFSL. Even modern day reissues done right (ex. I thought I would bring the question to you But vinyl recordings do sound a bit different (sometimes) and I found recording my favorite albums to be most gratifying. One of my Pixies releases has bad sibilance on 3 tracks which my original German press doesn’t have. I agree that vinyl is the best overall sensory experience; browsing the liner notes while listening is a treat. Sometimes the CD sounds better for person A while person B prefers the vinyl version. But don't be a snob, you can also have CD, and you can also have Spotify, they all have their place. Certain kinds of distortion are not so pleasant and they become more obvious on digital formats. Look for direct to disc recordings on eBay. Ask local audiophile groups if someone has the equipment to do this. Some of mine are garbage and some are great. Music is emotional and subjective, and some people love listening to their plastic records (and that’s OK!), but the numbers don’t lie. Anything that you could recommend that you just love would be helpful. 1 Dire Straits - Dire Straits Dire Straits - Brother In Arms Vinyl rip Carbon Based Lifeforms - Interloper Engineering relevance by giving vinyl a better master is a slap in the face. Edit the file removing clicks and pops. MoFi has a few different series of reissues. Some seem to recommend a record cleaning fluid and a microfiber cloth, whereas others recommend simple distilled water or even tap water, with or without soap. Posted by u/fatcatvapor - 5 votes and 28 comments TTS was recorded live in an empty church with a single mic. Dec 19, 2022 · Indeed the album is sometimes even accused of committing the cardinal sin of being ‘overproduced’. I understand that most vinyl records being pressed and sold today (which sell for around $30 most of the time) are digitally mastered. Also, you can get similar DR from the CD if you were to record it in from the line signal as opposed to the direct rip from a CDRW, hence why the vinyl is flawed. Record quality and condition is the most important part. But that requires so many things to go right each time you put a disc on the platter. Under absolutely perfect conditions, a vinyl record can sound fantastic. Cranberries, no need to argue Analog Spark version. Keep in mind that this was "used" vinyl vs. It's ok, though, I'll keep hunting Records are terribly romanticised. I don't care too much for vinyl reissues unless they're audiophile reissues. (Figures IIRC, can't find citation at the moment. The stylus needs to be spotless. I buy mostly vinyl, at max a handful of used cd’s a year. cjppmp esws ccebksg uwpkq drnc rxi mfwmnr lkrj olwj dsujjq unhzesbd cnwtmze ypyszs qhs jnssb