Best docker macos reddit. Thanks ! Both are great for different reasons.

Best docker macos reddit You can do it explicitly by setting one up yourself, or it'll be done transparently for you with Docker Desktop, colima, etc. I also see there is KVM-OSX which looks to be actively maintained, but I haven't heard anything about it. good question! Docker is a virtualization framework. Parallels support is trying to help, but they could not get it working either, so far. No matter what you run Docker on, the container is the same. g. I was really sad when they stopped supporting it not too long ago. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. I installed `docker-machine-parallels` with brew, it works as a docker engine but no USB passthrough. For example: Docker Desktop: A year back I still had containers with CentOS7 and wanted to run them with systemd. 4, 8. 13. With a clean install I just use the docker convenience script that they provide. Somehow I always run into problems with docker. Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. This was on relatively new hardware, mind you. Other than linuxserver not having a 32bit armhf image, I have no idea about - and haven't heard any - pros or cons between the two. It does not run Docker, but rather a Docker API-compatible replacement. Nor when you use this info you learn, they wont be using docker desktop. Mac/Windows, and what use case they have for it? What Docker containers are you running and for what purposes? Last time I bought one I had the choice between a M1 chip or an Intel, and I took Intel because the M1 was known to have problems when running Docker containers. It’s actually the best experience I’ve had so far with Docker during development, and unless something drastically changes on macOS I won’t be going back. To run docker on macos, you still need to run the docker system on top of the Linux kernel. I wanted to ask here if you could expand the list, maybe we can get enough together to actually help some new users. Also Debian or Ubuntu LTS (as Debian based distro). BUT i would prefer much Docker is an open-source project to easily create lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. Docker Desktop on MacOS, uses a Linux Virtual Machine, rather than running processes on the host, as it would in Linux. While older versions of Portainer had support for Standalone Docker Swarm, Portainer 1. Just as practice, I used docker-machine to run RancherOS in a VM to simulate On the Mac, filesystem performance when sharing files between docker and host has generally been abysmal, There's all sort of workarounds, which work for some workflows. Thanks ! Both are great for different reasons. Docker is easy to setup, backup (I have daily and weekly backups running on cron) and restore. A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. Standalone Docker Swarm >= 1. Using Vagrant (with VirtualBox) and running Linux in a real VM and from there installing docker+minikube is a MUCH better experience. io to set up Plex, *arrs, etc. MacOS in contrast, pulls the user towards a certain preferred way of doing things, and is quieter. PHP 7. The iMac automatically sleeps, which I want because the screen doesn’t need to be on, but this also temporarily stops the containers from being accessible externally until the screen is woken. I still use my MacBook Pro, but not for anything Docker related (my day job, basically). Since docker requires a linux kernel, running it on macOS (or Windows) will utilize a linux VM one way or another. more on that later. I would say there is no major difference between macos and windows for docker because both are using a linux VM to run docker inside, for Macos it is a QEMU VM. Also Windows has native windows containers and could run inside the same docker desktop or inside Windows Nano Core. I’m using an iMac with Docker to host a database. docker runs pretty well on macOS via colima. There is Docker Desktop to run it on those OSes. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run Docker Images with the ARM64 tag run on the Mac M1 natively. One would also assume they wish to do other tasks on the machine and based on 15 years of experience working as a software engineer, flat out Linux involves to much tinkering around and messing around to get something close to a useable machine whereas Windows and macOS to be fair I set my docker context to use a different device than my M1 macbook. Also their `docker-machine-parallels` GitHub repo appears abandoned (question raised in an issue drew no response from Parallels). But I would suggest to use Linux as OS for your Host as docker is native to Linux and doesn’t need a virtualization layer like on macOS or Windows. I’ve actually done this myself and repurposed my Mac Mini to run Linux 24/7. So AMD, Intel, ARMv8. It appears to use quite a bit less RAM. I'd assume that the linuxserver has more (not necessarily better) support on it as it's not sort of a one-man show? Yes docker can run on MacOS and Windows. and 1. If you use Rosetta 2, you can run amd64 images, but they can cause performance issues. What are the current best methods of virtualizing MacOS on I have Docker Desktop installed on an M1 MacBook Air but I rarely use Docker on it. true. I switched to minikube plus VMware Fusion when Docker screwed up Docker Desktop licensing and haven't had any issues since. I prefer Arch as I can keep it super lean. Either of the two images is fine, I'm using Jacobalberty as that's what I ran into first (I'm using RPi4 with RaspbianOS and docker). 6. WSL 1 is really doing nothing except allowing the Docker CLI / client to talk to Docker Desktop after doing a bit of configuration. Although I enjoy MacOS Monterey's control display on the upper right, but it's not worth the glitches/issues this OS has. The Docker experience is undeniably sub-par on MacOS compared to Linux, but I've not experienced any performance issues because of what I'm currently working on (which is Go) - my main complaint is that I often forget to start Docker for Mac, and I don't want ut to run on startup and drain more battery. Edit: found it. 3 (NOTE: Use of Standalone Docker Swarm is being discouraged since the introduction of built-in Swarm Mode in Docker. What is the purpose of running Docker? You have a Docker container that runs the same inside Docker no matter if the host is Linux, Windows, Mac, whatever. Docker Desktop on macOS is kind of crappy. Honestly, every time I have touched docker for any reason it turns out to be a rabbit hole that I could not get out! However, I should confess that it is very useful software and I have to use it for a couple of FLOSS I support. His question was which laptop is best for working in DevOps. 5? The recent Docker versions are not supported on my mac, and I managed to download one of the initial versions (version 1. As for what Linux Distro. Which MacOS update did you enjoy the best? Anecdote: Personally for me it was Mojave with the Dark Mode update and excellent resource usage iirc. Last week I bought a MiniPC off Amazon for $130 or so and it's very fast through RDP. I've had countless issues with docker from Docker for Desktop when using Minikube. Once its running you can use the docker compose templates from linuxserver. Or reach out via It's like saying satanic death metal is the underlying framework of gospel music because they both use notes. , and software that isn’t designed to restrict you in any way. How to know if the Mac is powerful enough to do all this? Just make sure the Mac has enough resources What happens when you try to pull the following MySQL Docker image on your Apple MacBook M1 Pro Tagged with docker, arm, macos. I'm not a fan of Docker. A RHEL based like AlmaLinux or Rocky is ok. One benefit of this is that podman's architecture is daemonless, which means it does not run a long-running program to monitor and interact with the containers. The only list i know of is awesom-docker, but it doesn't list the useful ones like the first three down below. I've not checked, but I'd guess that, inside that virtual machine, the docker daemon is running as root, but there's obviously VM I would like to run MacOS Ventura or Sonoma as a virtual machine on my Linux desktop. ) Apparently macos might be just perfect if you only use docker (or it might be slow, see replies below for the discording opinions). I cannot get the entire stack to talk to the internet faster than just a hair over 100mbps. 1) but it doesnt seem to work well anymore. Colima is Yes. Hey guys, Does anyone know where I can find a docker application that works for mac os 11. On PC, I'm using minikube plus VirtualBox. That being said, any Linux will be fine, and X/L/Ubuntu are all great. Otherwise, it's probably fine. Example's of popular Docker Images with ARM64 support are: Conduct Security Research on macOS using both Linux & Windows! Docker-OSX now has a Discord server & Telegram! The Discord is active on #docker-osx and anyone is welcome to come and ask questions, ideas, etc. I am looking for a good docker solution to run on macOS M1. For Windows to run Docker, Docker provides Desktop application which essentially a virtual machine running Docker runtime inside Hyper-V. I had problems with it crashing and didn't do anything more than enable Kubernetes. Have a docker setup on my NAS at home already - working really well and super happy with what I've been able to accomplish with it re: my home networking workflow. Can be hosted locally or on something like EC2 (I use both I get pretty solid performance from Docker Desktop for Mac, especially for the simplicity of installation. Think about this from a different angle. Ingress won't work. Curious as to those who have Docker running on personal computers ie. It seems that there's a network bandwidth cap that no one understands the reason for, and no one cares to fix, with WSL Docker. I'm not gonna argue in an os war :-) howerer my advice is against macos, unless, maybe, if you work in a docker shop. I have difficulty focusing, so MacOS’s design philosophy helps me a lot, although sometimes a dev’s desire to be minimalist can be a frustration. 17. The very best in my opinion is Arch Linux running Docker with all your media physically attached to the server. Are there still compatibility problems with the apple M2 chip? I absolutely need to be able to run docker containers flawlessly. I want to write step by step instructions for macOS users to install Docker using HomeBrew. Host networking won't work. Currently there is no DockerOS to run Docker. I've heard a lot of buzz for MacOS-Simple-KVM but I see there hasb't been an update in 3 years. You can run Podman as a service if you want though, so it will be more or less transparent. I've created re-usable workflows for GitHub Actions for my projects that allow me to build: any number of architectures per docker image different versions for docker images (e. my Mac Pro runs WIndows with WSL and Docker Desktop, and other than the networking issue, i have no problem with it at all. However, the built-in Swarm Mode of Docker is fully supported. 0 and newer do not support it. I should say that it Does this mean that Docker for macOS can (theoretically) run those VMs? Going one step further, does this mean that Docker could re-enable 32-bit support by emulating High Sierra and Mojave? Under the requirements for Docker-OSX it lists, "a x86_64 kvm-capable host," which of course immediately disqualifies an ARM Mac. The best bet is to format the hard drive and install a Linux distribution. This means software you are free to modify and distribute, such as applications licensed under the GNU General Public License, BSD license, MIT license, Apache license, etc. 82GB before I enabled the feature again docker contexts, the containers don't really run on my macbook Hi all, Just a quick one - what is the best NZB client for macOS? I’m currently using SABnzbd, but it seems very resource intensive and I’m not (yet) using a workflow where I’m adding items to it automatically, just ad-hoc NZBs, so happy to have a non I can understand that, but when you actually put that code out there it wont be on a MacOS Docker system. 0, etc) A host that can run docker. my perference is to run homebridge through there when possible as it has some very specific NPM dependencies that are best contained :) although i am a bit of a hipocrate, i run mine on a mac. While its written specifically for nvidia, the base docker setup instructions should help. We then launch a VM using special configuration flags to use macOS’s virtualisation layer and the translation of x86/amd64 into Apple Silicon. I actually We install colima, and the docker CLI. All good hosts. With VSCode remote I use an M1 Air essentially as a frontend to my Dev environments which are containers on a Linux server. It's just a Docker volume from a Windows mounted drive into the Docker Desktop VM. If you want a GUI to work with when deploying I would suggest something like Portainer. All kinds of file mount issues. 21 votes, 160 comments. . That’s one of the advantages of Docker. 2. But at some version, Docker Desktop changed something, so it didn't worked any longer. it works with a system of containers that remain contained separately from the rest of the system. Does it impact the battery significantly if I leave Docker Desktop running in the background all the time (with no containers started)? I have used Parallels and Fusion for years, but what I find out works best for me: I took a 2015 Macbook Air and installed Windows on it, then use RDP and haven't found anything faster. 1GB available to Docker containers, usage is actual usage 1. So like others have suggested I would swap that MacOS out for a Linux VM. 32GB in activity monitor, compared to the 1. Now the Intel option is gone, and the M2 is out. It's because Docker Desktop is doing the real work here. Night and day. your Mac needs to run a VM with Linux, and then Linux runs the docker containers. gwsg apquv lfnmnqp inaua rzbi seqsl sjyyx wetjspt lcdqb upkytz